Preliminary outline on the influence of Aron in the field of international relations in the anglo-saxon and peripheral worlds
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The studies of International Relations have been a predominantly Anglo-Saxon disciplinary field; however, Raymond Aron knew how to take a place in it. To unveil this situation, we set ourselves as the objective of this work to determine what their contributions have been, from the reading and analysis of his book Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (1962). The first point that we will develop is how the work of the French author is inserted in that particular paradigmatic moment in which the discipline was found, the realism of Morgenthaunian basis. Secondly, we will aim to show both the epistemological aspects of this work, by the conjunction of theory, sociology, history and praxeology, as well as the conceptual ones used to reveal the ways in which political units operate on the international system. The fact that our author is a rara avis in a field that speaks and thinks mostly in English is one of the issues that we intend to trace from knowing how they have been received and criticized by mainstream academics. But we do not want to stop there, we also wonder about what has been its impact on the studies of international relations in Argentina, especially in the work of Juan Carlos Puig. Finally, we will outline, on the basis of the elements contributed by his theory and methodology of analysis, how the current world could be read and be able to establish if his theoretical and conceptual instruments continue to explain the operation of the international system.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
References
Aguirre Zabala, I. (1993). Raymond Aron y la Teoría de las relaciones internacionales. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
Aron, R. (1954). De l'analyse des constellations diplomatiques. Revue française de science politique, 4(2), 237-251. Recuperado de : http://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsp_0035-2950_1954_num_4_2_452646
Aron, R. (1967). Qu’est-ce qu'une théorie des relations internationales? Revue française de science politique, 17(5), 837-861. Recuperado de: https://samuelbhfauredotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/s1-aron-1967.pdf.
Aron, R. (1981). Max weber y la política de poder. Papers: Revista de Sociología, 15, 33-53.
Aron, R. (1983a). El observador comprometido. Buenos Aires: Emecé.
Aron, R. (1983b). Mémoires. Paris: Julliard.
Aron, R. (1985). Paz y guerra entre las naciones. 1. Teoría y sociología. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Aron, R. (2002). Paz e guerra entre as nações Brasília. Brasília-São Paulo: Editora Universidade de Brasília - Instituto de Investigação de Relações Internacionais.
Bigo, D. (2017). Michel Foucault and International Relations: Cannibal Relations. En Ph. Bonditti, D. Bigo y F. Gros (Eds.), Foucault and the Modern International. Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics (pp. 33-56).New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dallanegra Pedraza, L. (2009). Realismo-Sistémico-Estructural: La Política Exterior como «Construcción » de Poder. Córdoba: Edición del Autor.
Deleuze, G. (2017). Derrames II. Aparatos del Estado y Axiomática capitalista. Buenos Aires: Cactus.
Duroselle, J-B. (1962). Paix et guerre entre les nations: la théorie des relations internationales selon Raymond Aron. En Revue française de science politique, 12(4), 963-979. Recuperado de: http://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsp_0035-2950_1962_num_12_4_403400.
Duroselle, J-B. (1998). Todo imperio perecerá. Teoría sobre las relaciones internacionales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Halliday, F. (2002). Las relaciones internacionales en un mundo en transformación. Madrid: Catarata.
Hoffman, S. (1963). Rousseau on War and Peace. En The American Political Science Review, 57(2), 317-333. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1952825.
Hoffmann, S. (1991). Jano y Minerva: Ensayos sobre la Guerra y la Paz. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
Hoffmann, S. (2006). Raymond Aron et la théorie des relations internationales. Politique étrangère, 4, 723-734. Recuperado de: https://www.cairn.info/revue-politique-etrangere-2006-4-page-723.htm.
Jaguaribe, H. (1979). Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. Revista Estudios Internacionales, 49, 91-130. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41392111
Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations by Raymond Aron. The American Political Science Review, 61(4), 1110-1112.
Mingst, K. (2006). Fundamentos de las Relaciones Internacionales. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica.
Paim, A. (2002). Prefacio. En R. Aron, Paz e guerra entre as nações (pp. 8-26). Brasília – São Paulo: Editora Universidade de Brasília - Instituto de Investigação de Relações Internacionais.
Peñas Esteban, F. J. (2018). Clío y Palas Atenea: Apuntes sobre el papel constitutivo de la Historia en la Teoría de Relaciones Internacionales. Relaciones Internacionales, 37, 59-93.
Puig, J. C. (1970). Discurso de Señor Profesor Dr.”¦, Presidente del Primer Seminario Nacional de Profesores e Investigadores de Derecho Internacional Público. En Asociación Argentina de Derecho Internacional, La enseñanza y la investigación en la materia (pp. 31-34). Córdoba: Instituto interamericano de Estudios Jurídicos Internacionales.
Puig, J. C. (1984). América Latina: políticas exteriores comparadas. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
Renovin, P., y Duroselle, J-. B. (1968). Introducción a la política internacional. Madrid: Rialp.
Simonoff, A. (2012). Teorías en movimiento. Rosario: Prohistoria.
Sombra Saraiva, J. F. (2008). História das Relações Internacionais do século XIX í lá era da globalização. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Tomassini, L. (1980). Los Estudios Internacionales en América Latina: algunas contribuciones. Estudios Internacionales, 52(13), 310-326.
Vigevani, T., y Cepaluni, G. (2011). A política externa brasileira: a busca de autonomia, de Sarney a Lula. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.